The Glory of Baby Jesus

Creepy medieval renderings of baby Jesus showed Him as a mini man because they thought it was disrespectful to paint Him as a baby. "If my baby looked like that, I'd sleep with one eye open" --Marc Driscoll
I seriously considered not writing anything about my thoughts about Christmas. In fact, until about an hour ago, I had no intention of writing about it at all. For several reasons. Mostly because it’s cliché and typical, and I don’t like to be either. Also because the incarnation is so far beyond me I can’t imagine being able to put forth any thoughts that are significant enough for you to take the time to read. And finally, because I haven’t posted letting you all know what I’ve been up to (but that’s a lame reason and I’ve stopped worrying about it. I’ll get to that in due time).
I ended up deciding to write because something seemed to poke at me this Christmas season that has never bothered me before. (And I’m not talking about the old lady who was a little too close behind me in line yesterday at my church’s Christmas dinner program and kept shuffling back up behind me every time I tried to shuffle forward). I can sometimes be a fairly easily irritable person so I didn’t give it much thought, but it poked at me over and over again. I still don’t know that my thoughts are significant enough to be shared. And really they’re a collection of thoughts that have mostly been stolen from others (and they’ll know it when they read this) culminating into one big thought. Either way, bare with me. It’s kind of a jumble. (Well, you don’t have to if you don’t want to, it’s just an idea).
The most constant focus I pick up on in protestant churches on Christmas is that we worship baby Jesus because we are moved by God, that He so humbled Himself to become the most helpless creature in such squalor conditions. Really, I agree, such a humble God amazes me. But what’s been poking at me is the line we use saying that in doing so He laid His glory aside.
To be clear, I should say that I use a definition of glory borrowed from my college pastor that means ‘to reveal something for what it is in it’s truest form’. So when we say that we are glorifying God, we’re saying that what we’re doing is revealing God for Who He truly is in our actions. When we say “Glory to God”, we’re saying “God, we see You for Who You are and it is awesome!!”
I guess what I want to say is that I don’t think that the Word laid His glory aside when He took up the form of a baby. I see the exact opposite when I read the story in the Bible. When Jesus was born, angels sang “glory” in the sky. Angels sang “this is Who God is in His truest form and it is awesome.” God is not two-faced. 2 Corinthians 3:18 says that in Jesus we see God for Who He really is, with “unveiled face”, meaning we don’t have to make educated guesses at Who He is by just looking at His actions towards us and what the prophets say like Moses had to in the Old Testament. We get to see Him in all His glory, revealed for Who He is in His truest form, by looking at Jesus. Jesus is not just showing one side of God. He is the truest image of Who God is. So when we see Him as a baby, I don’t think it’s that He laid aside His glory to come be a man, live here, die here, be resurrected and then go back to the Father to be all shiny and glorious again. I think that the humility we see in Jesus is the beginning of His life as the clearest representation of the Father.
God is love. And not our skewed perception of love, but the type of love described in 1 Corinthians 13, the type that is humble and self-sacrificing. His act of coming as a baby is, therefore, one of His most glorious moments. This is Him excitedly and willingly and joyfully putting into action the plan of adoption that Father, Son and Spirit had planned since the beginning of time. This is not Jesus coming, dragging His feet and mumbling, “If that dang Adam hadn’t gone and screwed it all up… guess I have to give up the sweet sparkly spoiled life in heaven to save their butts now.” He’s not like me coming to Costa Rica–giving up a lot of the “finer things” of life that I can have at any moment in the US to come and serve and love and be all humble and stuff in Costa Rica for a little while, throughout which, if I’m honest, I’m quite looking forward to returning to the spoiled things of the US. That was not Jesus’ attitude when He came. (And why did I always used to picture Jesus in heaven surrounded by mountains of gold?)
Before Adam ever sinned Jesus was the plan–adoption through Him becoming one of us so we could be included in the perfect love relationship of Father, Son, Spirit was always the plan. Jesus’ coming was the pinnacle moment for which all of creation was on the edge of its seat. God was so pleased for this moment and the form of His coming couldn’t have been more characteristic of Him. Humble.
We tend to read Philippians 2:6 as saying that “in spite of the fact that Jesus is God, He took the form of a servant”. But if we go back to the original Greek, a more accurate translation through a different hermeneutic reads that “precisely because Jesus is God, He did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped and made Himself nothing and came in the form of a servant.”
This is the “image of His Son” God is using the events in our lives to conform us to–that of His humble, self-sacrificing Son, the firstborn of many Who are to be adopted into the union of Father, Son & Spirit (Romans 8:29).
To sum it all up, I don’t think Jesus laid His glory aside when He came as a baby. I think it was the glorious beginning of His glorious life, death, resurrection, and ascension–the final Word. All of which glorifies God by giving us the clearest image of God in His truest form as a God Who is love, full of humility and sacrifice for the sake of His longing for relationship with creation.































